Wednesday 27 June 2012

TEN DISTINCTIONS OF SWAMI CHIDANANDA


TEN DISTINCTIONS OF SWAMI CHIDANANDA
(Swami Chidananda : Birth : 24.9.1916, Mahasamadhi : 28.8.2008)

Swami Chidananda, a realized soul, the foremost disciple of Gurudev Swami Sivananda and a distinguished saint in dasnami sannyasin tradition of Adi Shankaracharya served as a bridge between ancient India and modern world.  There was an excellence in his personality and a glimpse at his smiling face or listening to or reading a few words emanating from his saintly heart would do the magic and reveal the powerful spiritual force in his human personality. He was a personification of intellectual and scientific idealism, moral and spiritual idealism and provided great stimulus to people in all walks of life in the east and the west in 20th and 21st century and only coming generations will witness the culmination of his divine vision and mission.

There are ten types in Dasnami Sannyasin sampradaya of Adi Shankaracharya, ten principal Upanishadas on which Acharyas have written bhasyas and ten dishas (directions) referred to in the ritual worship. This inspires me to look deep into 10 distinguished points about life and work of Swami Chidananda.

  1. Unparalleled GurubhaktiGurubhakti is one thing which shines with resplendence in his life.. His life was a vibrant example of Guru Shishya Yoga so beautifully described by him in his writings. He had implicit and explicit Gurubhakti which surfaced in any thing that he preached or practiced.  None of his lecture or write up would complete without saying what Swami Sivananda had to say on that particular subject. He would give mantra dikshsa or Sannyas diksha in the name of Gurudev. He would address himself as a humble servant of Gurudev in all his oral and written communications. The classical manner in which he sang the famous Guru Mantra – Gurur Brahma Gurur Vishnu- in a deep breath at 2nd international DLS Conference at Cuttack in December 2007 still reverberates in our heart. Last but not the least, his will instructing to offer Jalsamadhi to his physical body & not to set up any memorial for him was a unique lesson in Gurubhakti. He was & he is now one with Gurudev.

  1. Personifying Maryada Purushottam Lord Rama – His life was also a personification of his ishta devata Lord Rama in the sense that he was Maryada Purushottam in all the roles played by him in his life as a student, brahmchari, sannyasin, speaker, writer, president or trustee of the Divine Life Society. He led spotless and exemplary life. He would never transgress the boundary drawn by law, professional etiquette or his own ideals and would not hesitate to seek pardon even when his well meaning action would unwittingly hurt somebody’s sentiments. Like Lord Rama, he endeared himself to one and all by his loving and compassionate nature & remained ajatshatru throughout his life.

  1. Compassion to mankind & all living beings (jiva) – He practiced cosmic spiritual consciousness that he professed. He had a room for one and all regardless of their size and stature. He loved and respected all aspirants, all saints, all sages and mankind at large. In this sense, he replicated his Guru Swami Sivananda whom he described as a great friend of mankind in the documentary film released in 1987 to mark his centenary. He adored hundreds and thousands of human beings not out of mere atmabhava but also by praising their contribution for good of the humanity in the relative phenomenal world. He would dwell on details of different missions as if he is a part & parcel of them. To err is human & to forgive is divine. Nobody knew this better than Swami Chidananda. His cosmic love embraced all from a small ant to a mighty elephant.

  1. Compassion to world (Jagat) - He saw the phenomenal world as manifestation of Divine and showed keen interest & deep reverence towards various objects of the world. Nothing would escape his penetrating vision and he would find time to inquire about different things like articles made out of clay, different institutions and different nations. He would even love to talk on United Nations Charter as a citizen of the world. His love for nature was stupendous and he would insist that flowers should not be spread in a zigzag manner and should never touch his feet. He was a rare mahatma that Bhagwad Gita describes as Vasudev sarvamiti sa mahatmane sudurlabhah  

  1. Supreme devotion to Lord (Jagdish) – He displayed deep reverence and adorations for all deities, incarnations, religions and apostles of Lord. Educated in missionary school & college, he embodied the Christian ideals of love & compassion and integrated them with the ideal of oneness of existence propounded in Vedanta and Hinduism. He was lovingly known as St. Francis of Assisi of east and would often chant his famous prayer “O Lord make me an instrument of thy peace”.  He was a synthesizer of Hinduism and Christianity, east and the west. He would sing bhajans of all deities with supreme bhava in melodious voice. He beheld one and nondual Self in and through all the pluralities of jiva, jagat & jagdish

  1. Spontaneity of expression: Like Gurudev Sivananda, he had the objectivity of a scientist, intuition of a clinician & expression of an artist. The unique phrases uttered by him had the potency of divine hymns. He would love to speak spontaneously and not confined to boundaries of any particular subject.  The short phrases like – “Change is inherent in nature & nature fulfils the change; Check the hypervitaminosis I; Don’t be afraid of getting well! and Asparsh yoga-so characteristic of him would greatly appeal the devotees  and on the other side,  one would struggle to find a full stop in his elaborate narration. The lucidity & originality in his expressions were next to none.

  1. Beauty & richness of language – What is more?.- The heartfelt expressions came out in a very sweet language. His expression in English was impeccable & he could communicate in many Indian & foreign languages. His write ups & speeches were a kind of thesaurus where he would render several words with near equivalent meaning without sounding repetitive. To put this in the language of performing vocalist, his speech was rendered in a pilu rag where artist would roam freely among all the 12 notes or like a Thumri rag bringing out adornment

  1. Clarity of upadesha- His brief addresses brought out in the books like- Ponder these truths, Seek the beyond & A call to liberation had wonderful take home message. The titles like - Be committed to the highest, What is true success, Looking at  problems from a different angle of vision, Cultivate positive attitude & In search of I are so touchy & inspiring that they will leave an indelible impression in the mind and prop up a man from deep dpression into dynamic action. The impact factor of his presentations was of very high order. He also put forth the message of Gurudev Sivananda and Adi Shankaracharya in a manner that could be assimilated by modern man. Our understanding of Gurudev Sivananda’s message of Divine Life would be incomplete until we read his commentary on Twenty spiritual instructions and Central theme of Swami Sivananda’s message to mankind. Likewise his commentary on Bhaj Govindam stotra of Sankaracharya & Verses addressed to the mind by Swami Ramdas place the true esoteric meaning of these teachings before us.

  1. Punctuality & Subtlety: He would always Adapt, Adjust and Accommodate as prescribed by Gurudev Sivananda. But equally important, he would accomplish this in a very orderly and meticulous way. He would write several letters to devotees at times by remaining awake at midnight on appropriate subjects & object. He would not accept any error in the spelling or composition in compiled or typed text.  He would insist on use of right word at right moment. On one occasion when devotee politely spoke that “Atman is to be asserted”, he intervened saying “No, Atman is not to be asserted, Atman is to be deeply felt & experienced”. He would even organize his small kit bag in 5 to 6 compartments & not allow others to do this seva for him. Sages say that order in nature is Iswara & he reflected this order in his individual life.

  1. Karma Yogi & Sannyasin Par excellence - He exemplified, demonstrated and radiated two types of sadhana for spiritual aspirants shown in Bhagavad Gita. One, Sadhana along the path of action for Karmayogi & two, sadhana along the path of knowledge for Sankhyayogi or vividisha sannyasin. His early & middle life as brahmachari; ‘doctor Raoji’ at Sivananda hospital & Airline wale baba taking message of Swami Sivananda and ancient India to the world is a fine example of wisdom filled action and Karma Yoga & his later life, guiding two international DLS conferences, construction of Swami Sivananda Satsang Bhavan at Sivanada Ashram, guiding ashram activities and its inmates by dwelling in solitude at Shantinivas Dehradun is a fine example of action oriented knowledge and Jnana Yoga. He showed that these two paths are in sequence and not two separate alternatives.

Swami has gone but Chidananda would live eternally in our hearts as our swarupa, our very being. Om Tat Sat.

Dr.Jayant B.Dave, Vadodara

IS SPIRITUALITY AN ART OR SCIENCE?


IS SPIRITUALITY AN ART OR SCIENCE?

 While I was reading the quotations on Art and Soul that appeared in sacred space column of TOI (June11, 2011) as a mark of respect to legendary artist M.F.Husain, a question arose in my mind – Is spirituality an art or science? Is it both art and science or neither?

The quotation by Rabindranath Tagore describing art as the response of man’s creative soul to the call of the Real appeared to align spirituality to art. The quotation of Claudia Lady Bird Jhonson describing art as window to man’s soul, quotation of Theodore Dreiser describing art as the stored honey of human soul and that of Hafiz describing art as one that makes divine silence in the soul break into applause speak of art as an expression of spirituality and vice versa

Swami Sivananda explains that both science and spirituality are engaged in search of truth. Their attitudes are same but fields of application vary. Science analyses, classifies and explains phenomena whereas spirituality transcends phenomena to attain immortality. Another great saint of 20th century Acharya Vinoba Bhave explains that science investigates universal self (vishvatma) whereas spirituality explores inner self (antaratma). Science light ups the exterior whereas spirituality enlightens inner self. Both are mutually supportive and lead to expansion, unity of mankind and world at large.
The science relates to objects and is therefore objective in nature defined by rules of external world whereas adhyatma or spirituality refers to content, innermost essence of the experiencing subject and is a subjective matter. The objective world (drashya/seen) and subject (drashta/seer) appear two distinct entities but Vedanta explains that in the ultimate analysis, object and subject are not different.  The substratum behind the objective world is called universal spirit (Tat/that) and substratum behind experiencing subject (Tvam /Thou) are not different and hence thou art that (Tat Tvam Asi) is the core message of upanishada. In other words, Iswara, the lord of manifested universe and jiva, the inner ruler are same in essence.

The whole debate reminds me of a lesson learnt by me in college days that tablet coating is an art than a science. The fact is that tablet coating is profoundly scientific process based on several kinetic and dynamic principles. Yet it requires an art, a subjective judgment of the coating process to be able to execute it skillfully and successfully. This can be safely extrapolated to infer that spirituality also entails both art and science. The working of body, mind and intellect (BMI) has to be tuned in an orderly and disciplined way in any spiritual practice and hence it is profoundly scientific as clearly felt in Raja yoga practice.  At the same time spirituality refers to raising our consciousness from BMI equipment to divine consciousness, from plurality to one and non-dual principle transcending body mind intellect and is an art as clearly experienced in transcendental meditation. Spirituality is thus both art and science.

From another point of view, doctrine of negation, spirituality can be described as neither science not art but absolute consciousness and bliss that remains after subletting all manifestations in the domain of art, science or anything else  for that matter.  Chidananda rupa sivoham sivoham, the finest message of Adi Sankaracharya in Atmashatak/Nirvanashtak